Tim Anderson details Microsoft’s shift to annual Visual Studio releases, monthly updates, and the impact on developers’ costs and workflows, alongside community feedback on licensing and usability.

Microsoft Visual Studio Update Cycle: Annual Releases and Developer Reactions

Microsoft is increasing the tempo of updates for Visual Studio, transitioning from quarterly to monthly feature releases and instituting annual major releases each November in sync with .NET schedules. Visual C++ (MSVC) is aligning to the same .NET release cycle, introducing a new release every six months (May and November), but most versions will now receive only nine months of support, with long-term support (LTS) releases every two years covered for three years.

Release Cadence Changes

  • Visual Studio will now feature monthly feature updates and a yearly major release (November).
  • MSVC (Visual C++) will have a semi-annual release schedule, most versions supported for just nine months.
  • Long term servicing channel (LTSC) builds give organizations a full year of ongoing support for stability.

Licensing and Cost Implications

  • Stand-alone Professional license holders must purchase new annual versions each year to stay current.
  • Subscription models may be preferable to avoid annual repurchasing.
  • The Community Edition remains free for individuals and small businesses (under 250 PCs, less than $1M annual revenue), but licensing terms severely restrict usage beyond these limits, especially in development and testing for larger organizations.

Feature Updates and Developer Tools

  • Monthly updates keep integration with tools like GitHub Copilot current, aligning Visual Studio with VS Code’s frequent AI-related feature additions.
  • The release cycle aims to improve security and compliance; Microsoft emphasizes that using outdated compilers is inadvisable for customers aiming to meet standards such as NIST and CISA.
  • The IDE (Visual Studio) is now decoupled from build tools, SDKs, and runtimes, allowing each component to follow its own lifecycle.

Community Feedback and Usability

  • Developers have voiced concerns about increased costs associated with the new licensing model and frequent release cycle.
  • UI changes have prompted requests to restore the classic blue theme, with Microsoft introducing alternative tinted themes in place of exact recreations.
  • The community edition’s restrictions exclude most larger teams and organizations, increasing the reliance on paid licenses and subscriptions.

Key Takeaways

  • Professional developers will need to evaluate whether subscriptions or annual licenses better fit their needs under the new update cadence.
  • Keeping up to date is increasingly important for security compliance under new standards.
  • The monthly updates ensure that tools such as GitHub Copilot and integrations remain current.
  • Community concerns about usability, cost, and design flexibility continue to be a topic of discussion.

References

This post appeared first on “DevClass”. Read the entire article here