Dellenny presents a practical overview of Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) as a lightweight governance model, guiding modern software teams in documenting architectural choices without sacrificing agility.

Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): A Lightweight Governance Model for Modern Teams

Author: Dellenny
Published: November 13, 2025

Introduction

Modern software teams often struggle to balance rapid delivery with the need for clear, maintainable architectural decisions. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) provide a practical approach, allowing teams to efficiently document the ‘why’ behind key technical choices, improving both transparency and accountability.

What Are Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)?

ADRs are short, structured documents that record significant architectural decisions during a project. They typically include:

  • Title: Decision topic (e.g., “Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database”)
  • Status: Proposed, accepted, superseded, or deprecated
  • Context: Background or problem prompting the decision
  • Decision: The architectural choice
  • Consequences: Results, trade-offs, and future implications

Originally popularized by Michael Nygard, ADRs help make architectural rationale explicit, collaborative, and trackable over time. They are commonly kept in plain-text markdown files, usually stored alongside the project’s code in version control.

Why ADRs Matter for Agile and DevOps Teams

As organizations embrace agile and DevOps, decision-making becomes decentralized. While this empowers teams, it also risks losing sight of architectural alignment and creates knowledge silos. ADRs offer a solution by introducing lightweight, self-documenting governance that encourages:

  • Transparency: Everyone sees what decisions were made, why, and when.
  • Traceability: Developers can track the evolution of architectural thinking.
  • Consistency: Teams can reuse or reference previous decisions, reducing redundant work.
  • Resilience: When team members leave, architectural context remains accessible.
  • Agility: ADRs can be evolved or superseded as projects grow.

How ADRs Enable Lightweight Governance

Good governance enables alignment without bureaucracy. ADRs contribute by:

  1. Decentralized Decision-Making, Centralized Visibility: Each team manages its own ADRs but shares them organization-wide for unified understanding.
  2. Continuous Learning: By reflecting on past decisions, teams foster a culture of architectural thinking and improvement.
  3. Minimal Overhead: ADRs are quick to write and integrate easily into modern developer workflows, sometimes automated with templates or GitHub Actions.
  4. Change Management: Superseded ADRs are retained, providing a historical record of evolving architectural choices.

Adopting ADRs: A Practical Guide

Get started with ADRs using these steps:

  1. Start Small: Pilot ADRs on one project or domain, storing them in a docs/adr/ folder.
  2. Keep Templates Simple: Only include key fields (Title, Status, Context, Decision, Consequences).
  3. Make ADRs Part of the Workflow: Document decisions during significant architectural changes.
  4. Share and Review: Discuss ADRs in sprint reviews and design meetings for broader buy-in.
  5. Automate Where Possible: Utilize GitHub templates or actions to streamline ADR creation.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don’t document every minor decision—focus on impactful, long-term ones.
  • Keep ADRs up to date; treat them as living documents.
  • Foster team buy-in by demonstrating ADR value for clarity and rework reduction.

Conclusion

ADRs are a low-friction, high-value tool to capture architectural knowledge and support agile, DevOps-driven organizations. By making decisions explicit and accessible, they reduce confusion, enable onboarding, and preserve organizational memory.

Further Reading and Tools:

This post appeared first on “Dellenny’s Blog”. Read the entire article here