Sumeet Singh explores how AI is reshaping software development, security, and compliance, detailing new models for continuous risk management and automation in the SDLC.

Securing the AI Era: How Development, Security, and Compliance Must Evolve

By Sumeet Singh

The Code Boom and Its Paradox

Software development is undergoing a major transformation due to the rise of AI copilots, automated agents, and low-code platforms. This acceleration enables code generation in minutes rather than weeks. However, the rapid increase in code comes with higher security risks, expanding the attack surface and introducing unpredictability and novel threats. Traditional security approaches can’t keep pace with the development speed enabled by AI.

Maker and Checker: An Evolving Model

Historically, the maker/checker model separated developers and security analysts to ensure dual control. With the speed of AI-driven development, manual security reviews become bottlenecks. The solution is not to abandon this model, but to rewire it—transforming security from gatekeeping to continuous guardrails that provide real-time feedback and scalable enforcement.

The Developer’s New Role

Developers now function as curators of AI output, integrating or rejecting suggestions based on security. Guardrails within IDEs flag unsafe code as developers work. Developers must build features with embedded security, but without becoming full-time security specialists. Instead, secure defaults and automated guidance increase both velocity and safety.

Evolution of Security Roles

Security analysts and engineers must shift focus from manual triage and patching to building platforms that embed policy-as-code and real-time guardrails into every stage of the SDLC. Roles like Security Automator and risk-ops engineer are central to tuning security signals and scaling automated defenses for large teams.

Continuous Risk Loop in the SDLC

The SDLC is now an ongoing cycle:

  • Build: Code creation by humans and AI.
  • Intercept: Real-time guardrails catch insecure code.
  • Triage: Risks prioritized by exploitability and impact.
  • Remediate: Automated or suggested fixes.
  • Govern: Continuous alignment with organizational security and compliance requirements.

All of this must operate seamlessly during every commit and deployment.

Product Security: Platforms vs. Policies

Product security is shifting from checklists and manual reviews to engineering platforms. Policies become code in CI/CD pipelines. Guardrails and dashboards supply automated evidence of security, enabling continuous enforcement rather than post-hoc validation.

Compliance as a Driver for Better Security

Compliance frameworks such as PCI DSS 4.0, NIST SSDF, and NIST CSF 2.0 now demand that organizations manage vulnerabilities continuously and embed secure workflows throughout the SDLC. Governance and accountability are increasingly central to strong security controls.

Metrics for the AI Era

Velocity must be balanced with safety. Modern metrics include:

  • Mean time to intercept unsafe code
  • Percentage of vulnerabilities prevented pre-commit
  • Automated remediation rates
  • Risk coverage across codebases and services

The combination of velocity (e.g., DORA metrics) with tangible security measurements creates a holistic view of organizational software health.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

AI is transforming software and its security landscape. Developers become curators and first responders, while security professionals design scalable platforms and automations. The SDLC operates as a continuous risk loop, and compliance evolves to drive real-world security improvements. Organizations succeeding in this new era will measure both speed and safety, adopting automation, guardrails, and governance to ensure software is robust and resilient.

References

This post appeared first on “DevOps Blog”. Read the entire article here